CONTEMPT OF COURT BY BRETHERTONS solicitors ET AL

NO. OF MATTER: FD09P00655 and FD08P02334

IN THE MATTER OF ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, TREATIES AND JURISDICTIONS
EMPHASIS: IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

HISTORICAL RECORD DATED AUGUST 1, 2010
In regards to the Largest Art Theft in History with 1732 Original Paintings of Multidimensional Art Made by Dapacu.
His son is kidnapped, his father murder at 79 years old after a fraud against them for over 35 million dollars (in 46 days of frivolous proceedings held secret and out of jurisdiction), the trespassing and theft of all their property, with full consular support.

All based all in one little lie.

The mother ( an illegal alien in Texas and ex girlfriend who did not even lived with the father and had just moved to Texas 8 months before) made impossible the return of the father and child to their country to claim he kidnap the child, including theft of their travel documents, trespassing to his homestead and several other acts.

But also to steal all from the parents of the father (around 80 years of age(crimes against the elderly) purposely held secret and out of jurisdiction.)

ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN ARE BACK UP WITH EVIDENCE RECORDS OF THE TIME OF THE EVENTS.
FRAUD UNDER THE FRAUD ACT OF 2006 AND CONTEMPT UNDER THE STRICT RULE OF CONTEMPT

PROCEEDINGS ARE TAKING PLACE IN MEXICO AND TEXAS AGAINST SAMANTHA LOWRY ET AL PREVIOUS TO PROCEEDINGS IN ENGLAND AND CONTINUING. INCLUDING FOR THEFT, CRIMES AGAINST THE ELDERLY, CRIMES AGAINST THE CHILD, FRAUD, THEFT OF OVER 1732 PAINTINGS, THEFT OF REAL ESTATE, KIDNAPPING AND FURTHER CAUSES OF ACTION FURTHER DESCRIBED ON THE RECORDS SAMANTHA HAS CONFIRM SERVICE THROUGHOUT PROCEEDINGS.

To be read with attachments
Application to set aside or vary order made without notice

23.10
A person who was not served with a copy of the application notice before an order was made under rule 23.9, may apply to have the order set aside or varied

Injunction for a Nunc Pro Tunc Retroactive Court Order

For the Dismissal of totally without merit applications
The father hereby request all orders be set aside and vacated until a fact finding hearing takes place.

DANIEL PAVON CUELLAR ET AL VS SAMANTHA LOWRY ET AL
Please take notice that any proceedings for any child custody determination is to be made in Texas by laws and agreement of the Parents and once both parents can be present and be heard in any and all proceedings (see applicable laws and the International settlement agreement under Hague proceedings, furthermore, Mexican Jurisdictions and laws also applies) Sebastian is Mexican citizen by constitution and born American Citizen

Case No: FD08P02334 is founded on fraud and deception, on contempt of court. A case open for and by fraud upon the court, a fraud to the public by using public funding and shall be vacated as vexatious,.

Unfounded harassment and false claims and in violation of the fraud act of 2006 and in contempt of Court, in violations of law to obstruct other proceedings.

A CASE OPEN PRECISELY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE, BY FRAUD AND DECEPTION IN THREE COUNTRIES, TO VIOLATE TREATIES TO THEIR BREACH. A CASE OF CONTINUOUS CONTEMPT BY THE STRICT RULE OF CONTEMPT, FOR FRAUD UNDER THE FRAUD ACT OF 2006. FOR AIDING AND ABETTING KIDNAPPING , THEFT, FRAUD AND MORE (TEXAS AND MEXICAN PROCEEDINGS TO THE ORIGINAL CLAIM CONTINUE):

Furthermore, The Brethertons and other professionals have committed several crimes under the existing proceedings abroad in Mexico and Texas, including but not limited to aiding theft, aiding fraud, aiding kidnapping, breach of treaty, breach of laws and violations to human, civil and children rights even by their orders made ex-parte and secretly, violations to constitutions, child abuse, and other breaches to applicable laws, willfully , knowingly and with malice, following illegal process with malicious intent, Criminal conspiracy by omission and concealment of records to obtain gains for themselves and others, even through public funding:
For any and all matters please refer to the applicable laws , treaties and jurisdictions

EMPHASIS ON THE FRAUD ACT 2006

1.Fraud

2.Fraud by false representation

3.Fraud by failing to disclose information

4.Fraud by abuse of position

When referred herein Sam, Samantha, Samantha Lowry, Lowry refers to Samantha Jennifer Lowry Et Al, et al from all defendants of proceedings in Mexico and United States of America.

The father commenced proceedings in England under the Hague Convention on abduction on May 2008.
Websites of the case with records of evidence and all true facts proven therein were created early 2008.
Summary of the case FD08P02334

1)The Lowry start proceedings in secret AROUND October of 2008, the official solicitor acts as advocate for the father (as if the father would be mentally unable) WITHOUT NOTICE TO THE FATHER NOR ANYONE IN HIS FAMILY.

2)They attempt to change the name of the baby, which directly violates Human Rights, children rights and aiding theft, fraud and crimes, including kidnapping

3)They conceal records, including the international settlement agreement under Hague proceedings as well as “their gains”

4)They place orders against the father, with penal notice, once again threatening his assets spite that all property and assets remains stolen by the mother and such orders with penal notice, WITHOUT NOTICE TO THE FATHER

5)Once they know or admit to know (In writing) of the father proceedings under the Hague convention January 20, 2009, Samantha Lowry Et Al immediately took all possible acts of fraud, of concealment of records to prevent the father to know about their previous proceedings of fraud and immediately hide all records and all names and take illegal acts for the concealment of the child and for concealment of information that the treaty grants, also conceal all of their names directly aiding and abetting kidnapping, fraud and theft. Even concealment of all records and previous proceedings that the father by law has rights to them.

6)on EX-PARTE proceedings the Lowry et al obtain orders to fully obstruct the convention Treaty and without opportunity for the father to be heard, vary such orders or refute such claims. FRAUD AND CONTEMPT. With this case number that should have immediately stayed after their knowledge of Hague proceedings, did not and did all to obstruct the Treaty and other treaties with this case number, and did so, with already proven forgeries, fabricated records, perjuries, omissions, concealment of records, of facts and for aiding the kidnapping of the child as well as the concealment of the whereabouts of the child and theft of all property. Even today To even hide the whereabouts of the child and all his records after their claims have been proven false.

7)It has been proven to the court clearly and with evidence records: the forgeries, fabricated records, and all her false claims mostly using her own evidence against her. SAMANTHA HAS NOT PROVE A SINGLE CLAIM SHE HAS MADE. HER EVIDENCE PROVE HER CLAIMS ARE FALSE

EXAMPLE November 3, 2007 email with claims to kill the child and kill officials from an email account that was not even an email of the father and proven to court to have been sent by the Lowry to use it on a pre-planned fraud of kidnapping to obtain gains in the millions, aided and abetted by her attorney Milner (Working on recovery) and voids her duress claim that was already not granted by the Judge in Texas.

REMOVING ANY OBSTACLES FOR THE COMPLIANCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT UNDER HAGUE PROCEEDINGS.

8)In this case and for unexplained reason, all the pleadings of the father to the court unanswered, unheard, unconsidered, ignored while harassment and threats do not end by the Lowry et al, but increase and illegal acts do no cease but feel more free by the lack of punishment to their acts.

All hiding behind the baby, using him for their own gains, regardless of his welfare and rights and while aiding and abetting kidnapping for gains; becomes child exploitation and fraud.

CONTEMPT OF COURT BY THE STRICT RULE AND FRAUD UNDER THE FRAUD ACT OF 2006
THIS RECORD HAS PLACED THE EVIDENCE WITHIN THE SAME RECORD, FURTHER CONTEMPT AND FRAUD IS FURTHER DESCRIBED UNTIL THE END OF THIS RECORD.

Breach of order of Justice Hedley:
“Save for a full and unedited transcript of the Judgment herein, both the plaintiff Father and the defendant mother are prohibited from disclosing any document file and served in these proceedings into the public domain without prior permission of this court”

DOES THE BREACH VIOLATES THE STRICT RULE OF CONTEMPT: Yes, the records published by Samantha Lowry et al, the Brethertons and mimecast.com are full of perjuries, libel, defamation, slander already proven in the bundles of the court and for the sole purpose to obstruct proceedings abroad and in breach of the order of the court;

1)PUBLISHING INTO THE INTERNET ALL TYPES OF RECORDS OF THE PROCEEDINGS, INCLUDING ORDERS, JUDGMENTS AND PROCEEDINGS IN BREACH OF THE ORDERS OF THE COURT AND IN CONTEMPT.

2)ALL THE RECORDS PUBLISHED CAN BE ACCESS WITHOUT ANY TYPE OF RESTRICTION BY ANYONE FROM ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.

3)ALL RECORDS CONTAINED DEFAMATION, LIBEL AND SLANDER ALREADY PROVEN TO COURT IN THE BUNDLES, WITH THE MALICIOUS INTENT TO OBSTRUCT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE IN THESE PROCEEDINGS AND ALL THE OTHERS ABROAD INCLUDING CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS.

CONTINUE TO NEXT PART